Skip to content
Adrythm
Working with an agency

Trademark

service mark / brand name protection / TM / registering a business name

In short

A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design that identifies your goods or services and indicates where they come from. It is not ownership of the word itself. The USPTO is blunt about that: rights attach to how the word is used with your specific goods or services, not to the word in general.

The USPTO describes a trademark as any word, phrase, symbol, design, or a combination of those things that identifies your goods or services. Its framing is worth keeping, because it is about the customer rather than the paperwork: it is how customers recognize you in the marketplace and distinguish you from your competitors.

The statute says the same thing more precisely, and one clause in it is easy to miss. Under 15 U.S.C. 1127, the term includes any word, name, symbol, or device used to identify and distinguish a person's goods from those manufactured or sold by others, and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown. That final phrase matters. A mark still does its job when the shopper has no idea which company is behind it. What it carries is the fact that all of it comes from the same place.

Which leads to the thing most people have backwards. The USPTO states plainly that a common misconception is that holding a trademark means you own a particular word or phrase and can stop others using it. You do not have rights to the word in general. You have rights to that word as used with your particular goods or services. The protection is in the connection, not the word.

One piece of vocabulary tidies up a lot of confusion. A trademark is used for goods and a service mark is used for services, and the USPTO notes that the word trademark is commonly used to refer to both. So a business selling services usually holds what is technically a service mark, and almost nobody says so out loud.

In practice

This is why two unrelated businesses can use the same ordinary word without either being in the wrong. Each is using it with different goods or services, so neither is reaching into the other's connection. It is also why a name that feels distinctive to you can already be taken in your field and completely free in another.

Not the same as

A registered company name
Registering a business entity with a state records who you are. It does not establish rights in a mark used with goods or services.
A domain name
Holding the domain means you control an address. It is a separate question from whether the name functions as a mark.

Why it matters to you

When an agency creates a name, a logo or a wordmark for you, what you end up with are two separate things, and people routinely assume they are one. There is the mark, which is about use with your goods or services and may or may not be registered, and there is ownership of the artwork and files, which is a question of who created them and what the contract says. Settling one does not settle the other.

What to ask or check

  1. 01Which goods or services would this mark actually be used with?
  2. 02Is something similar already in use in that same field?
  3. 03Separately from the mark, who owns the design work and the files?

What people get wrong

That a trademark means you own a word and can stop anyone using it. The USPTO calls this out directly: rights run to the word as used with your specific goods or services, not to the word in general.

Red flags

  • A name chosen without anyone checking the field it will actually be used in.
  • Brand work delivered with the mark and the artwork ownership treated as one settled question.
  • A company registration or a domain purchase presented as securing the name.

Who owns it

The mark belongs to whoever uses it with the goods or services. The artwork is a separate question, which is where work made for hire comes in.

Where you will see it

In branding proposals, contracts for naming or logo work, and any conversation about whether a name is available.

Work made for hire

Work made for hire is the legal category that decides who owns something you paid to have made. Copyright starts with whoever created the work. For commissioned work it only becomes yours through one of two narrow routes in the statute, and software fits neither by default.

Consumer Review Fairness Act

The Consumer Review Fairness Act voids contract terms that stop customers reviewing you. A provision of a standard-form contract is void from the start if it bars a review, penalizes one, or takes the reviewer's intellectual property. Removing abusive or irrelevant content is still allowed.

Typical results

Typical results is the standard a testimonial has to meet before it can be advertised. The FTC Endorsement Guides treat a specific result as a claim about what customers will generally achieve, and the Commission tested the usual disclaimers. Neither one reduced that impression, so a caveat does not fix an unrepresentative case study.

Hiring an SEO

Google publishes its own advice on hiring an SEO, and it is blunter than most agency marketing. No one can guarantee a number one ranking, a claimed special relationship with Google is a warning sign, and you remain responsible for what anyone you hire does to your site.

Account ownership

Account ownership decides who keeps the advertising account and its history when an agency relationship ends. Google lets anyone with administrative access unlink from a manager account at any time. Microsoft names the fix when the account was created in the wrong place, and lists what cannot be moved.

Manager account

A manager account is the umbrella account an agency uses to run several advertising accounts from one login. Linking one to your account is normal. Giving it ownership is not the same thing: Google says a manager account can be given ownership of a client account, which lets it manage who has access.

Want this explained against your own numbers?

Twenty minutes, a straight answer, and no follow-up sequence if you decide not to work with us.